PDA

View Full Version : Inception review



JasonEvans
07-13-2010, 12:56 PM
Hollywood is bereft of original ideas. Nothing new or challenging or actually thoughtful comes out of Hollywood anymore.

That is what everyone has been saying lately... and they are right.

And then along came Christopher Nolan ;)

In a word, Inception is incredible. It is a complicated film that tells a story so full of layers and interpretations I cannot imagine what the screenplay must have looked like. The film is confusing, make not mistake about it. My wife was peppering me with questions throughout and we spent an hour after it was done discussing what had happened and what it meant. Do not go in expecting a film that lays everything out for you in a nice, easy fashion.

But that is ok -- heck it is great! I want a film that challenges the audience and forces it to think about what is going on. I want some questions and conversation about what it all meant. I guarantee one thing, the moment the movie ends, you will turn to the people next to you and begin talking about what happened... and you won't stop talking about it for a while.

The acting is strong, with a nice ensemble cast surrounding Leo. I am not sure I would call this an "actor's movie" though as the complexity of the story dominates the film. Still, no one stinks up the screen and all the characters are believable.

http://content6.flixster.com/rtmovie/67/28/67288_ori.jpg

The special effects are wonderful and propel the film at a breakneck pace, but they somehow manage to not be overwhelming -- which almost seems impossible in retrospect. There is one fight scene about 3/4 of the way through the movie involving Joseph Gordon-Levitt and a nameless attacker that is one of the best directed and executed fight scenes I have ever seen. It was groundbreaking and jaw-dropping, much like some of the action in the first Matrix film. When the scene ended, I found myself breaking into applause -- EVEN THOUGH THE MOVIE WAS STILL GOING!! I heard several other people in the theater clapping too and many murmurs of "wow!" form elsewhere. Needless to say, there was even more applause from the crowd when the film did end ;)

It is worth noting that the effects are woven beautifully into the story. They are not extraneous eye-candy, they are an integral part of what is going on and explaining the worlds we are in.

http://content7.flixster.com/rtmovie/67/23/67237_ori.jpg

I keep on going back to the story, because it is so impressive. At one point, the film is telling something like 4 stories at the same time. In many ways, this film hearkens back to the first film that got Christopher Nolan noticed, Memento, which was so notable for its complexly layered story. Like Memento, this picture is a study of what happens inside the mind. If you enjoyed that film, you will certainly like this one too.

I have rambled long enough. Suffice it to say that Inception is one of the finest science fiction films ever made. It has a long running time, close to 2 1/2 hours, and you may get frustrated at times because of the complexity of the story -- but it is worth it! It is a pity Nolan's films always get released in the summer, because if this was released around Christmas and promoted for an Oscar run, it would be almost a shoe-in for Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Screenplay.

Please note-- there are no spoilers in this post and I would discourage them in this thread... I'll start a separate thread for discussion of the film among folks who have already seen it and can tolerate spoilers.

--Jason "What a truly remarkable film. A must see, in my opinion" Evans

NashvilleDevil
07-14-2010, 02:47 PM
I am seeing it tomorrow at midnight. With a 13 month old I have to pick my movies and this was the only one I wanted to see this summer. Looking forward to discussing this movie with others as they see it.

JasonEvans
07-15-2010, 09:45 PM
If anyone is interested in listening, I will be on the radio in Atlanta tomorrow morning at 9am ET to do a review of Inception.

You can listen to the stream of it here: http://www.790thezone.com/listenlive/index.aspx.

--Jason "been reading some other reviews-- most of the critics seem to agree with me that this is a really special flick" Evans

NashvilleDevil
07-16-2010, 08:18 AM
Saw it last night and still processing. Our theater erupted in applause when it ended. I mean erupted like some of those bars after Landon Donovan's goal. The 2 1/2 hours flew by and I cannot wait to see it again. Nolan does some amazing work in this one. The special effects are awesome and Jason is right that they do not distract from the movie.

I look forward to seeing what others think.

77devil
07-16-2010, 11:45 AM
--Jason "been reading some other reviews-- most of the critics seem to agree with me that this is a really special flick" Evans

I find the reviews by Joe Morgenstern in the WSJ best suited to my taste. He's on vacation this week, unfortunately, but the sub. absolutely panned the movie. The underlying premise seems absurd-full disclosure, I thought the Matrix was stupid too-but I loved Memento and very much enjoyed the Dark Night as entertainment. Think I'll have to see this one based on Jason's strong review, but wish I had Joe's recommendation too before laying out the cash.

77 "I want a refund from Jason if I'm disappointed." Devil

Mal
07-16-2010, 02:07 PM
I usually find that if I wait for Joe Morgenstern to give a positive review before checking out a movie, I never actually get to see any movies. ;) Just kidding - he's gotten a lot more positive the last two or three years.

On the other end of the spectrum from the Journal's panning, Ebert loved this film, as did Peter Travers and Kenneth Turan. I looked on Metacritic, and there's a lot at both ends here - some giving rave reviews and saying this movie shows Avatar to be crap and some slamming it as too complex, too confusing, and crumbling under its own weight. A.O. Scott, Andrew O'Hehir and David Edelstein all disliked it. I note the user rating there, however, is 9.1, so early audiences apparently dig the heck out of it.

JasonEvans
07-16-2010, 02:20 PM
It ain't an easy film. It is not obvious and it is confusing at times. If you are not a sci-fi fan, I could see you finding the premise tough to swallow.

That said, I cannot understand critics who dislike this film. This is the exact picture that everyone moans about Hollywood never making. A studio went out and spent big money ($160 million) on something that was not an established product, was not an easy-to-understand idea, and was a big risk. I mean, if nothing else, don't you have to give Nolan and his financial backers (Legendary Pictures & Warner Bros.) big props for even attempting this?!?!

The critics who do not like it are likely also trying to be contrarian to the overwhelming wave of positive buzz and reviews that came out early on this flick. Sigh. I don't know what they want from a sci-fi film to like it if they don't like this flick.

--Jason "if you think you MIGHT like it, I bet you will" Evans

JasonEvans
07-16-2010, 02:25 PM
Worth noting, despite some critics negative comments, Inception is at 84% on Rotten Tomatoes. Most of the positive reviews are glowing.

Among major theatrical releases this summer, only Toy Story 3 has a higher rating.

--Jason "I am frustrated it is not above 90%" Evans

Udaman
07-16-2010, 02:25 PM
Agreed. One can certainly find faults with this movie - but to pan it makes no sense at all. This is a groundbreaking and visually stunning movie, with excellent acting and directing.

NashvilleDevil
07-16-2010, 03:45 PM
Rex Reed wrote a scathing review without mentioning the movie at all. He went after Nolan, Kaufman and DiCaprio.

JasonEvans
07-16-2010, 04:53 PM
Rex Reed wrote a scathing review without mentioning the movie at all. He went after Nolan, Kaufman and DiCaprio.

Rex Reed is an idiot. For example, here is one of his opening lines--


(Christopher Nolan is a) Hollywood hack from London whose movies are a colossal waste of time, money and I.Q. points.

So, we establish right off the bat that this is a critic who hated Memento, Dark Knight, Batman Begins, or The Prestige. That is kinda hard to believe considering the praise and awards those films have won. Maybe I am wrong?


Like other Christopher Nolan head scratchers-the brainless Memento, the perilously inert Insomnia, the contrived illusionist thriller The Prestige, the idiotic Batman Begins and the mechanical, maniacally baffling and laughably overrated The Dark Knight-this latest deadly exercise in smart-aleck filmmaking without purpose from Mr. Nolan's scrambled eggs for brains makes no sense whatsoever.

Well, it is clear to me that Rex Reed is simply not smart enough to follow the plots in Christopher Nolan films. On the other hand, he loved the Uma Thurman disaster Motherhood last year and he was a huge fan of the truly wretched Amelia with Hilary Swank.

I did a bit more research -- wanna know what he wrote about the "maniacally baffling" Dark Knight? He called it "insurmountable fun." During his review of that film, while making many critical points, he admits that he had fun at the movie and enjoyed it. Of course, his review is so stupid as to talk at length about how it does not make sense that Heath Ledger is The Joker when Jack Nicholson was also the Joker years ago. Ummm, Rex, are you aware that the new Batman films are not following the same story/timeline as the ones made 20 years ago?!?!

Sheesh!

I just wish I got the New York Observer in print so I could put Rex Reed's review to real use -- I think I am out of toiler paper.

--Jason "you are allowed to dislike Inception -- but at least come up with a legit reason for it" Evans

NashvilleDevil
07-16-2010, 05:04 PM
I thought it was moronic. I think some of these critics cannot wrap their heads around the complexity of the movie.

Ping Lin
07-16-2010, 08:24 PM
A good friend, after watching the movie with me, made an interesting point: the binomiality of the criticism may well be generational.

He made the point that those of us who've grown up with video games and are familiar with all their attendant terms can more easily get what's going on -- heck, during the tutorial phase, Cobb tells Ariadne about "levels"! (I confess I immediately thought about level editors and Doom/Quake maps when hearing this.) My friend accentuated the point when he said the dream needed a programmer, a level designer, a scripter, etc.

To those not familiar with the gaming world, however, such terms thrown about may feel arbitrary and confusing.

darthur
07-16-2010, 10:52 PM
Rex Reed is an idiot. For example, here is one of his opening lines--

In his defense, at least he's not Armond White:

http://www.nypress.com/article-21357-bored-game.html

brevity
07-17-2010, 05:38 AM
There is one fight scene about 3/4 of the way through the movie involving Joseph Gordon-Levitt and a nameless attacker that is one of the best directed and executed fight scenes I have ever seen.

Just commented about other parts of the film in the separate spoiler thread, but wanted to say something about this. One of the big criticisms of Christopher Nolan, specifically in the Batman films, is that he can't direct action or fight scenes. (This was from people who otherwise loved those movies.)

Needless to say, I'm way impressed by his rebuttal.

snowdenscold
07-18-2010, 09:39 AM
Just saw it last night. I went in knowing absolutely nothing about it, other than that I'd heard good things (here and elsewhere). Did not disappoint. I am reluctant to go out to movies since it cost $11 per ticket for my wife and me, but I didn't mind spending it here.